Linda O’Learyhas been found not guilty of careless operation of a vessel following a boat crash that killed two people on Ontario’sLake Josephtwo years ago.
O’Leary, the wife of celebrity businessmanKevin O’Leary, was in the driver’s seat returning to her cottage from a dinner party when her boat collided with another vessel in Seguin, Ont., on the night of Aug. 24, 2019. Kevin O’Leary and a family friend were also on the boat with Linda at the time of the crash.
Two people on the other boat — Gary Poltash, 64, from Florida, and Suzana Brito, 48, from Uxbridge, Ont. — died from their injuries. Three others were also hurt.
Story continues below advertisement
The decision
On Tuesday, Justice Richard Humphrey said court concluded that the Crown failed to establish evidence that Linda O’Leary drove her boat without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for others.
“The Crown’s submission, in essence, is that the defendant Linda O’Leary ought to have been mindful of the potential risk of an unlit boat being in her path, and by reason thereof, should have driven at a lesser speed than she did so as to avoid the collision,” Humphreysaid.
He told court the Crown’s argument almost suggests that no one should operate a boat at night under any circumstances.
He also said the Crown’s argument essentially “disregards” the case law that relates to Linda O’Leary’s circumstances.
Kevin O’Leary testifies at wife’s fatal boat crash trial
Speed of the O’Leary boat
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
In the decision,Humphreysaid the court was unable to draw a conclusion regarding the speed of the O’Leary boat, including whether it was “excessive.”
Story continues below advertisement
He said the Crown didn’t present expert evidence to establish that the planing of the O’Leary boat was unsafe. He also said the Crown didn’t call in expert evidence to suggest a safe speed in the circumstances of the crash.
“The Crown produced no expert evidence probative of safe boating practices or safety regulations that the defendant contravened,” Humphreytold court Tuesday.
Navigation lights on the other boat
During Linda O’Leary’s trial, a key point of contention was whether the navigation lights on the other boat were on.
- Ontario renter eventually moves out, 11 months after he stopped paying rent
- Ford government will not ‘take no for an answer’ on Highway 401 tunnel plan
- ‘Motivated’ buyers could spur uptick in Toronto-area real estate, agents say
- Trial hears accused had licence suspended 3 days before fatal Ontario crash
- Poilievre backs involuntary drug and psychiatric treatment for kids, prisoners
- Lethbridge food banks in need of donations for upcoming holiday season
- Focus BC: Countdown to the 2024 provincial election
- New Kirkland development cause for concern, say housing advocates
The other vessel, a 16-seat Nautique, belonged to Irv Edwards, though his friend Richard Ruh had taken over driving at the time of the crash.
Humphreysaid court has “no hesitancy” in concluding that the lights on Edwards’ boat were off.
He said video evidence from the O’Leary cottage — and somewhat from Edwards’ cottage — makes it “clear” that the navigation lights weren’t on at the time of the crash.
Trending Now
- 100 years later, foot of lost Mount Everest climber Andrew Irvine likely found
- Garth Brooks names rape accuser, says she’s blackmailing him for millions
“The video evidence shows the O’Leary vessel’s navigational lights to be clearly visible,”Humphreysaid. “If on, the Nautique’s lights ought to have been equally visible.”
Story continues below advertisement
Questions over Linda O’Leary’s alcohol consumption
Humphreysaid court concluded that alcohol “played no part” in relating to the charge that Linda O’Leary faced.
During her trial, police testified that Linda O’Leary registered an “alert range” of blood alcohol on a breath test that was taken shortly after the crash.
However,Humphreysaid there was evidence from Crown witnesses that Linda O’Leary was “cautious” of what she drank when operating her boat and that she had made it known that she was the designated driver on the night the crash occurred.
Video evidence of Linda O’Leary’s arrival and departure from the other cottage showed “no lack ofco-ordination” or “any other limitation” that could be attributed to alcohol consumption, Humphreysaid.
“The only evidence of the presence and effects of alcohol came from Const. Ingram, when she spoke to Mrs. O’Leary on (a) second occasion at 1:12 a.m.,” he told court, adding that the roadside screening device is not considered scientific for court purposes.
Humphreysaid the paramedic who attended to Linda O’Leary after the crash made no observations of the effects of alcohol. He also said there’s evidence that a person who was at the O’Leary cottage after the crash gave Linda apartially filledglass of clear liquid from the bar after she suggested she needed a drink to calm her nerves.
Story continues below advertisement
The decision on the O’Leary trial was read out in Parry Sound court and streamed over Zoom on Tuesday morning.
Trial begins for Linda O’Leary, charged in fatal boat crash
- Trial begins for Linda O’Leary, charged in fatal boat crash
- Kevin O’Leary’s wife charged in connection with fatal boat crash in northern Ontario
© 2021 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.